Comparison
NEVARIS itself names medium-sized to larger construction companies as its target group. A firm working through framework contracts with fifteen people is not who is meant.
Scale
This table does not compare feature lists. It compares which kind of firm a system was built for.
| Criterion | Levora | NEVARIS |
|---|---|---|
| Target group per the vendor | road and civil engineering, 5 – 50 employees | medium-sized to larger construction companies |
| Trade coverage | one trade, deliberately | broad |
| Handwritten take-off read from a photo | yes | ask the vendor |
| Framework call-offs as their own transaction | yes | ask the vendor |
| Scheduling, project controlling | no, deliberately not | ask the vendor |
| Accounting | no – ends at the invoice | ask the vendor |
Where it says “ask the vendor”, we found no public statement and claim nothing. In a selection process, those are exactly the rows to put to both vendors.
Honestly
If you are growing and starting to run several sites with subcontractors in parallel, to keep construction schedules and to control costs across projects, then you need a system of that category. Levora cannot do that and will not be able to – it says so on our product page too.
Buying a system from a larger category before you need it is, however, the more common mistake. The effort starts immediately, the benefit only later.
The honest test
Frequently asked
Twenty minutes about your call-off numbers and your office routine say more than any feature list.
